Ultimate Sacrafice
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:08 pm
Comment's appreciated.
Comment's appreciated.
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:08 pm
Comment's appreciated.
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:12 pmwow....that is like the best you ever done!!
10/10
10/10
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:47 pmthanks!
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 7:59 amdefinatly amazing!
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 2:39 pm8.4/10
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 3:14 pmMailasG wrote:8.4/10
might wanna explain why?
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 7:55 amcause mailas has a funny way of rating.... i dont know why....
i say 9.8/10
the text could use some work.
[Off-topic] PSPruler nice tech boarder!
i say 9.8/10
the text could use some work.
[Off-topic] PSPruler nice tech boarder!
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 11:06 amHow is that funny.
I just gave a simple rating. Now I have to explain why?
Hmmm, because the renders blending looks good.
I just gave a simple rating. Now I have to explain why?
Hmmm, because the renders blending looks good.
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:20 pmok so, why did you give a 8.4 then? not trying to Suspicious or anything,
just out of curiosity.
just out of curiosity.
Posted: Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:15 pmHmmm, because the renders blending looks good.
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:15 pmi was saying funny because i have no idea on how u rate... like, u may rate something low that desirves a higher rating
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:32 pmMailasG wrote:Hmmm, because the renders blending looks good.
no...what I MEANT was...
why did you give him a lower rating out of 10?
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 12:58 pm.Vault wrote:i was saying funny because i have no idea on how u rate... like, u may rate something low that desirves a higher rating
Man ppl here have to bring up something dont they?
A rating that is low is the opinion of a person.
It doesnt deserve a bigger rating, its just my opinion. And thats a good rating.
I dont see how thats a weird way or rating if I just put 8.4/10.
Gosh let it go!
BTW, 8.4/10 is not a low rating.
Posted: Tue Jul 25, 2006 2:34 pmOk Mailas, how should I put this to make you understand lol.....
when we rate sigs and think its really good....we put 10/10
usually Mailas when you give lower rating for EXAMPLE: 6/10 instead of 10/10
you always explain something about the sig you dont like when you give a
rating like that. So if you thought the renders were good, and didnt think any
else was bad about the sig, then THE QUESTION IS: why did you give him
a 8.4 instead of a 10/10?
when we rate sigs and think its really good....we put 10/10
usually Mailas when you give lower rating for EXAMPLE: 6/10 instead of 10/10
you always explain something about the sig you dont like when you give a
rating like that. So if you thought the renders were good, and didnt think any
else was bad about the sig, then THE QUESTION IS: why did you give him
a 8.4 instead of a 10/10?