DarkPacMan77 wrote:TheTyler0013 wrote:DarkPacMan77 wrote:Tyler and his weak dual-core processor... snicker snicker
-DarkPacMan77-
YEP YEP I NO UR JELOUSE lol.
Quad 3.825
-DarkPacMan77-
ace_012 wrote:DarkPacMan77 wrote:TheTyler0013 wrote:DarkPacMan77 wrote:Tyler and his weak dual-core processor... snicker snicker
-DarkPacMan77-
YEP YEP I NO UR JELOUSE lol.
Quad 3.825
-DarkPacMan77-
You cheating overachiever....
And technically its 3.736 Ghz
D3ViLsAdvocate wrote:Try shaking the salt harder onto your tongue.
DarkPacMan77 wrote:ace_012 wrote:DarkPacMan77 wrote:TheTyler0013 wrote:DarkPacMan77 wrote:Tyler and his weak dual-core processor... snicker snicker
-DarkPacMan77-
YEP YEP I NO UR JELOUSE lol.
Quad 3.825
-DarkPacMan77-
You cheating overachiever....
And technically its 3.736 Ghz
How do you figure? If you are doing the math and it comes out wrong, it's probably because I have Advanced Clock Calibration in the BIOS turned on to +2% so it could be throwing stuff off a little without "being visible"? I ran the numbers through a calculator and it came out to 3.810 so I'm betting that is what is throwing the numbers off. Maybe I'll put it to +12? lol
-DarkPacMan77-
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 232 guests