[MAG] *(PS3)*

your saying micosoft isnt gonna "get on its knees"

so what, sony did? no matter what microsoft does (and you know they tried) they arent getting it. the xbox just physically cant do it.

[BKFraiders7]

Ok, tell me why Microsoft's Xbox 360 cant "physically cant"? It cant be servers, because the 360s servers are technically "better". If not please provide a source.

And I know Microsoft asked them to be on their console..if you were the maker wouldnt you want every game on your console?... but once they said no i can pretty much guarantee you they just said ok and let it pass.

[DarkPacMan77]

airplanes, stop arguing with my moderator and reread his posts for clarification on what their meaning are. On top of that though, I don't think the 360 can run a game like MAG efficiently enough to be worthwhile to begin with. Run it? Yes, but worse than PS3.

-DarkPacMan77-

*hides anger* yes sir.

i was just stating their reasons (in the begining)

in order, thats what the company said not me, HOP OFF. notice the QUOTES!?!? i wont go into why i htink thats true


and alex, i was exaggerating,,, you dont need to be up my donkey cuz i seemed alittle serious.


PLAY IT. its a really awesome game. better than cod could ever hope to be.

well im not getting overated cod either.
im getting games, i personaly want and i know i won't be disapointed.
for starters im not getting a ps3 as they have slower networks then my nan walking downstairs.
Your opinion is your opinion lol.

how do they have slower servers? where did you learn that?

that makes no sense to me. the more powerful system has lame servers? those that hold MORE than the 360's servers? that doesnt make ANY sense!


one of zippers reasons for not making mag for 360 was tha the servers couldnt handle the massive size even if the console somehow could!

a powerful machine has nothing to do with server speed, don't be anumpty *facepalm*
i have a rubbish computer and a good computer, the good ones not going to be faster, *unless the internet rate becomes higher then the slower computer can handle in downloading*
PS3 doesn't put as much cash into its networks, and evertime i go round my mates to see him, its funly enough ever slow, actualy down or so laggy its not worth it, *he has a good connection, i know this, xbox works fine for him*
im still laughing you thought a more powerful machine had a better speed though lol.
ty for the late night bed giggles

[BKFraiders7]

I would like to, Airplanes, where you see the PS3 servers are better than Xbox. I havent seen one way or the other really and the people I have seen say something about it say that Xbox has the better servers.

i didnt understand half of what you said. funly? anumpty?


and so what sony doesnt put money in theeir servers? at least sony doesnt waste your money on a POS mobo, they give you another and another.

and waste your money on laggy servers full of cheaters. i pass.

i dont want to get in the console war, cuz niether of us will win. so ill say this, again. DO YOU TRUST A COMPANY THAT HAS BEEN MAKING DECENT ELECTRONICS SINCE THE EARLIEST TECH, OR DO YOU TRUST THE COMPANY FROM THE 70'S THAT CANT EVEN MAC AN OS WORK CORRECTLY?

[BKFraiders7]

and so what sony doesnt put money in theeir servers? at least sony doesnt waste your money on a POS mobo, they give you another and another.

and waste your money on laggy servers full of cheaters. i pass.

i dont want to get in the console war, cuz niether of us will win. so ill say this, again. DO YOU TRUST A COMPANY THAT HAS BEEN MAKING DECENT ELECTRONICS SINCE THE EARLIEST TECH, OR DO YOU TRUST THE COMPANY FROM THE 70'S THAT CANT EVEN MAC AN OS WORK CORRECTLY?

Or do I trust what a guy tells me that cant spell? Jk airplanes.

Yea were not going to start a console war, but please post that link.

will do. lemme find it.

and i meant MAKE. i wasnt even thinking mac, promise!

but i have a valid point here


heres some sanning. i didnt read this one all the way, but this is what THEY said.
http://www.gamerzines.com/ps3/news/xbox ... ipper.html oh, and xbox servers dont do 256 v 256, does it?

I haven't played the game so I can't say how it is on PS3 but it would have been great on 360 because there is much more communication on Live. It looks like a much more strategic game than the average cod fps.

Also, the PS3 servers are fine. Are the 360's better? Probably, but that doesn't mean the PS3's are lagy or slow. I have played thousands of matches on the PS3 and I've had little problems. The Problem is either with the connection or PS3 itself.

I know you are reluctant to believe airplanes because he is crazy , but the PS3's servers are FINE.

well advent, ill tell you, call of duty has NOTHING on mag. its crazy. and pretty nice.


but i notice when high pingers enter, shots tend to miss instead of visual lag. not as annoying initially, but annoying.



we kick those who ping high.

[BKFraiders7]

I am unsure what you mean by 256 v 256.

But thats not the link I was looking for. Im looking for Server dominance between the 2.

He means 256 man v 256 man battles. Bungie could probably make it happen though.